The mechanic for embracing the paradox is "faithful disagreement", within the context of my religious tradition. A good secular framework for this same principle are Rusty's Rules of Order (a simplified version of Robert's Rules).
The purpose of embracing the paradox with the principles of faithful disagreement is to avoid war and the destruction of the human race.
There is a tendency in humans. One tendency pulls to progression, and the other towards regression, and both of these tendencies exist in every single human being.
These tendencies exist in greater or lesser degrees depending on the values of a person instilled by their community, their individual biology, and the material environment in which they came to be.
The cultural skin that these tendencies are labelled with vary from culture to culture but ultimately, these behaviors are the same thing different font. Right-left. Progressive-Conservative. Fundamentalism-Heterodoxy. So-on. So-forth.
Nobody exists within either of these pure binaries, and we contain multitudes. A true believer exists in a simpler moral paradigm because they value the tribal identity and comfort that comes with that identity. A heterodox believer may not fit the mold of the tribe perfectly and therefore seek to change it to be more accepting of their non-traditional peculiarities.
This may seem simple enough but on closer examination, if we interrogate every person's beliefs, line by line, you will likely find that the line blurs when you get into the specifics.
The IWW is a leftist solidarity workers union, and yet fairly frequently in their materials, will reject the aesthetics of leftism and point out that conservative workers often make better comrades on the shop floor.
Social Media personalities with hammers and sickles and circle a's in their bios will often shrink away from actions that aren't performative because often these same people came to their perspective by the gifts of education from an upper middle class upbringing that had the necessary material means to support their endeavors that a proletarian worker wouldn't actually have access to reach those same conclusions.
These same aesthetical radicals often find that to engage in effective versus performative protest would threaten their own material conditions, and default to behaviors that favor bourgeoisie dominance.
And then in the middle and the outer fringes you have a mix of people engaging in a mix of actions, effective and performative, from all across the material class spectrum.
Everyone's revolutionary impetus is different. Everyone revolts for their own reasons.
Likewise, on either extreme end of the tendencies of progression and regression tendencies are extremely destructive behaviors. Those committed to the far end of the reactionary end of the spectrum evolve into fascists while those on the far end of the revolutionary spectrum evolve into violent extremists who behave in much the same way as the fascists.
The behavioral function undergirding this phenomena is the alienation these groups have experienced in the current paradigm, with increasingly smaller and smaller amounts of personal agency to achieve anything they hope for in their lives, and increasingly greater lionization of their respective utopian worlds.
As desperation increases, so to grows the willingness to engage in increasingly desperate and violent actions to attain their utopias.
Thus is human nature - at this current point in time. But the naturalistic fallacy is a fallacy for a reason. There is nothing inherent in the laws of physics that demand any state of being continue to exist in a configuration in perpetuity.
Joyful Warrior is a project where I share my thoughts and notes surrounding my endless philosophical line of interrogation aimed toward my over-blown ego. I do this so that maybe you can glean something useful in the quest to sublimate your own worst tendencies in the journey to be a better human being and build a stronger human family.